tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-68946892652327862522024-03-13T01:05:37.810-07:00Sweet Jesus I Hate Chris MatthewsExposing the wankery, the douchebaggery, the fecal stainery, and the general foul pusbag that is MSNBC's Chris MatthewsJillhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03865082576641051315noreply@blogger.comBlogger46125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6894689265232786252.post-73211377901482805392016-09-08T19:08:00.000-07:002016-09-08T19:11:19.602-07:00Looks like we have to do this again.It's been almost a year to the day since I last posted, and what a year it's been! But here we are, in September 2016, another presidential election is upon us, and the candidates are an autocratic thug who admires Vladimir Putin, a well-qualified and well-known woman who just happens to carry the last name of "Clinton", which means that the right is on its quadriennial conspiracy theory binge, and in the third party category, we have a would-be Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces who doesn't know what Aleppo is (but favors legal pot) and Tofu Palin.<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
So what inspired me to let my Hate Flag fly for Chris Matthews again? Watch for yourself. <a href="http://www.msnbc.com/hardball/watch/giuliani-defends-trump-s-praise-of-putin-760863811666">Watch what he lets Rudy Ghouliani (sic) get away with, with hardly a rebuttal</a>. Because in 2016, if you have demonstrable truth being compared against utter horseshit, the two are treated as having equal validity. </div>
<br/><br/>
Jillhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03865082576641051315noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6894689265232786252.post-34468717708463193832015-09-16T03:56:00.002-07:002015-09-16T03:56:48.037-07:00A leopard never changes his spotsHello, strangers! <br />
<br />
So it's three years later, and MSNBC has decided that it's given the liberal wonkocracy enough time to try to catch up to the reality TV of CNN and the unreality TV of Fox. So it's decided to move back to the right a bit.<br />
<br />
We're not quite at "Alan Keyes Is Making Sense" level yet (though I would not rule out the possibility of a medical show with Ben Carson if he doesn't get the GOP nod this year), but even the great Rachel Maddow has been relegated to the All Donald Trump All The Time beat. <br />
<br />
It's hard to say what's more embarrassing about this clip: Chris Matthews demonstrating that he really doesn't have a clue about what Bernie Sanders stands for, his reference to "vaudeville", which is clearly code for "Jewish", or the fact that a comedian, Bill Maher, has to lecture him about how far he and his network have strayed from not just journalism, but even intelligent commentary.<br />
<br />
<iframe allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="336" src="//embed.crooksandliars.com/embed/96F79Ur1" width="600"></iframe>Jillhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03865082576641051315noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6894689265232786252.post-24960112387216578252012-05-23T19:17:00.000-07:002012-05-23T19:17:45.066-07:00It's been a long time, but just when you thought Tweety had learned something...It just goes to show you, <a href="http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:http://www.fair.org/blog/2012/05/23/chris-matthews-cable-news-would-have-stopped-iraq-war-lies/&hl=en&prmd=imvns&strip=1">we should never, ever let our guard down with people like Tweety</a>:<br/>
<blockquote><p>Reporting from the big cable TV industry event this week, Broadcasting & Cable's Andrea Morabito writes (<a href="http://www.broadcastingcable.com/article/484964-Cable_Show_2012_Balancing_Political_Facts_Opinion_a_Delicate_Balance_in_Cable_News.php">5/22/12</a>):<br />
</p>
<p>Hardball host Chris Matthews argued that because of the rise of opinion-based news networks, the non-critical aspect of the media is gone, going as far to say that the reporting that verified the U.S. administration's claims about weapons of mass destruction in Iraq in 2002 would not happen today because of cable news.</p>
<p>"I would like to think there would be a reckoning we didn’t have then because of modern media," Matthews said. "24/7 is good because it's not only breadth, it's depth. Without cable, it is just network [television] thinking, embedded thinking, which is dangerous in a democracy."</p>
<p>Umm… He's aware of the fact that cable news channels existed in 2002, right?</p>
<p>In fact, here's some of what he and his cable colleagues were doing:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.fair.org/index.php?page=3062">September 25, 2002</a></p>
<p>—MSNBC's Hardball host Chris Matthews asks of World Bank/IMF protests in Washington DC: "Those people out in the streets, do they hate America?" Conservative pundit Cliff May responds: "Yes, I'm afraid a lot of them do. They hate America. They align themselves with Saddam Hussein. They align themselves with terrorists all over the world." Hardball correspondent David Shuster later adds that "anti-Americanism is in the air."</p></blockquote>
<br/>
(via <a href="http://digbysblog.blogspot.com/2012/05/tweety-revisionism.html">Digby</a>)Jillhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03865082576641051315noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6894689265232786252.post-14859617923496726332010-09-04T04:58:00.001-07:002010-09-04T04:59:49.872-07:00Maybe Chris Matthews should give his salary to David Broder tooHeather over at C&L had the intestinal fortitude to watch <i>Hardball</i> the other night and caught <a href="http://videocafe.crooksandliars.com/bluegal/hardball-maybe-david-broder-can-break-it-p">this little gem</a>.Jillhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03865082576641051315noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6894689265232786252.post-69551921966212484752010-07-02T02:41:00.000-07:002010-07-02T02:42:52.182-07:00Why can't Tweety do this more often?It's easy for Chris Matthews to be hard on random idiots like Rick Barber who talk about less government while angling for a government paycheck. Why can't he be this tough on those already entrenched in Washington?<br /><div align="center"><br /><object width="420" height="245" id="msnbc34d8a4" classid="clsid:D27CDB6E-AE6D-11cf-96B8-444553540000" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=10,0,0,0"><param name="movie" value="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/32545640" /><param name="FlashVars" value="launch=38026725&width=420&height=245" /><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always" /><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="wmode" value="opaque" /><embed name="msnbc34d8a4" src="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/32545640" width="420" height="245" FlashVars="launch=38026725&width=420&height=245" allowscriptaccess="always" allowFullScreen="true" wmode="opaque" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" pluginspage="http://www.adobe.com/shockwave/download/download.cgi?P1_Prod_Version=ShockwaveFlash"></embed></object><br /></div>Jillhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03865082576641051315noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6894689265232786252.post-36721042696100312402010-02-12T16:50:00.001-08:002010-02-12T16:54:24.188-08:00Uh, Tweety? If you knew anything about Scott Garrett you'd know he IS a wingnutOn Tuesday, Tweety declared that Rep. Scott Garrett, lunatic right Congressman from NJ-5, isn't one of those "wackys" in the Republican Party:<br /><div align="center"><br /><object width="420" height="245" id="msnbc18fc82" classid="clsid:D27CDB6E-AE6D-11cf-96B8-444553540000" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=10,0,0,0"><param name="movie" value="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/32545640"><param name="FlashVars" value="launch=35319042&width=420&height=245"><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always" /><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="wmode" value="opaque" /><embed name="msnbc18fc82" src="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/32545640" width="420" height="245" FlashVars="launch=35319042&width=420&height=245" allowscriptaccess="always" allowFullScreen="true" wmode="opaque" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" pluginspage="http://www.adobe.com/shockwave/download/download.cgi?P1_Prod_Version=ShockwaveFlash"></embed></object><br /></div><br />I know all about Scott Garrett, because he's my Congressman. I've worked on three different campaigns to oust him. Scott Garrett keeps getting re-elected because the populous part of his district, Bergen County, is a party-line-voting district in which the majority is registered as Republican. Marge Roukema was our representative for 25 years, and she was the kind of moderate Republican that today Jim DeMint would drum right out of the party.<br /><br />Garrett is a doctrinaire conservative who opposes extensions of unemployment benefits, relief for victims of natural disasters, and anything in opposition to the Tom DeLay/Jim DeMint/Looney DeLooney ideology of I Got Mine and Fuck You.<br /><br />Matthews once again shows himself to be an uninformed idiot.<br /><br />(<a href="http://www.bluejersey.com/diary/14449/mathews-to-garrett-theres-a-few-wackys-out-there-in-your-party-but-youre-not-one-of-them">h/t</a>)Jillhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03865082576641051315noreply@blogger.com2tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6894689265232786252.post-33252130878460478252010-01-28T02:51:00.000-08:002010-01-28T02:58:24.187-08:00OMG, you mean the President is BLACK?????For ONE WHOLE HOUR, Chris Matthews forgot that Barack Obama is black:<br /><div align="center"><br /><object width='320' height='260'><param name='movie' value='http://cloudfront.mediamatters.org/static/flash/player.swf'></param><param name='flashvars' value='config=http://mediamatters.org/embed/cfg2?id=201001270078'></param><param name='allowscriptaccess' value='always'></param><param name='allownetworking' value='all'></param><embed src='http://cloudfront.mediamatters.org/static/flash/player.swf' type='application/x-shockwave-flash' flashvars='config=http://mediamatters.org/embed/cfg2?id=201001270078' allowscriptaccess='always' allowfullscreen='true' width='320' height='260'></embed></object><br /></div><br />Where do you even start? The sad thing is that Tweety makes a good comment here about how the Republicans are nothing other than "someone else". They have no ideas, no plans, no agenda for running this country, other than letting entropy take over. But that the first thing that ran through his head was that the President is black? What has he been doing, putting paper cutouts of George Bush's head over Obama's face? And what's this with Tessio and Clemenza? Tweety really needs to stop playing SOTU drinking games.Jillhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03865082576641051315noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6894689265232786252.post-32672153514827228572010-01-24T03:52:00.000-08:002010-01-24T03:56:11.216-08:00Get a room already.George W. Bush's stuffed codpiece is SO 2000's. Barack Obama is yesterday's news. The one who thrills Chris Matthews these days is former Cosmo centerfold Scott Brown:<br /><div align="center"><br /><object width="425" height="355"><param name="movie" value="http://embed.crooksandliars.com/v/MTE2MTQtMzQ0Mjc"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://embed.crooksandliars.com/v/MTE2MTQtMzQ0Mjc" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="355"></embed></object><br /></div><br /><a href="http://crooksandliars.com/nicole-belle/chris-matthews-move-over-sarah-palin">Nicole Belle</a>:<br /><blockquote><p>Matthews has a near sociopathic ability to separate intent from merit. There is no factoring in for truth, or right, or justice, or selflessness. There's <a href="http://digbysblog.blogspot.com/2010/01/shoot-me-now-by-digby-hardball-is.html">no consideration for the issues or the impact on Americans</a>. It's all about being "hot". It's all about how Matthews responds to the politico with his little Tweety.</p><br /></blockquote>Jillhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03865082576641051315noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6894689265232786252.post-39239376154767105162009-12-31T03:09:00.000-08:002009-12-31T03:49:55.368-08:00Why Tweety is so infuriating -- in a nutshellYesterday Chris Matthews pointed out to Ron Christie [insert your own sound clip of closet door closing here], the toadying former aide to Dick Cheney the FACT, the double standard that Cheney and the entire Republican Party REALITY of the Bush Administration's lack of response to both the threats before the 9/11 attacks and to Richard Reid, the December 2001 shoe bomber. Of course he had to, given Joan Walsh's ferocious presentation of facts. But Tweety didn't stop there; he went on to point out that everyone on the right (and that includes Joe Lieberman) is using the attempted bombing on Christmas Day as an excuse to beat the drums for an expanded war in the Middle East.<br /><br />Watch:<br /><div align="center"><br /><object width="420" height="245" id="msnbc8b8566"><param name="movie" value="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/32545640" classid="clsid:D27CDB6E-AE6D-11cf-96B8-444553540000" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=10,0,0,0"><param name="FlashVars" value="launch=34635137^352519^557106&width=420&height=245"><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always" /><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="wmode" value="opaque" /><embed name="msnbc8b8566" src="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/32545640" width="420" height="245" FlashVars="launch=34635137^352519^557106&width=420&height=245" allowscriptaccess="always" allowFullScreen="true" wmode="opaque" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" pluginspage="http://www.adobe.com/shockwave/download/download.cgi?P1_Prod_Version=ShockwaveFlash"></embed></object></p><br /></div><br /><br />What's hilarious about this exchange is the Republicans regard the Democrats as the "Pussy Party", a bunch of overwrought, overly-emotional girly-men, not the real manly-man chest-beaters like Dick Cheney. Except who is it that's running around like a chicken without a head because a depressed, angry, alienated 23-year-old decided to get laid by 72 virgins in heaven? And yet here is Cheney's ventriloquist's dummy, complaining that Barack Obama isn't emotional enough. <br /><br />So why is this an example of Why I Hate Chris Matthews? Because it shows that TWEETY KNOWS BETTER, even more often than what we saw last night, he does crap like <a href="http://digbysblog.blogspot.com/2009/12/save-us-president-daddy-by-digby-please.html">this</a>:<br /><blockquote>The press loves the boogeyman story because it makes them feel like crusaders for freedom and allows them to make common cause with macho right wingers. It's far more exciting than dull stories about losers who don't have jobs --- you can see the exhilaration coming off of them in waves. They love it.<br /><br />Case in point, Chris Matthews, who is ready to force everyone to be cavity searched in the ticket line:<br /><br /><blockquote>Matthews: You know what when we get on an airplane, we give up all kinds of checks we don't do by just walking down the street. I think we give up a certain amount of rights just getting on an airplane and I think you've got to recognize that your safety is tied up with everyone else on that plane's safety and anybody else that gets hit on that plane. You don't own the right to be on that plane because you're getting on an airplane so you do have to yield some civil rights...And by the way, Cliff, you know it and I know it, they're going to get smarter and smarter and sooner or later they're going to get all kinds of people to do their dirty work for them. They're the enemy. They're going to use any means they can to get us. They're out to kill us. Let's be as smart as they are because they are already smart.</blockquote><br /><br />Run fer yer lives!<br /><br />Apparently, Matthews thinks that there is some Koranic law that requires all attacks against America to take place on an airplane. If some terrorist with imagination succeeds in a mall or on a bridge will we have to submit to profiliong and screening there too? Sounds like it.(And if he thinks these would-be terrorists like Richard Reid and Abdulmutallab are super criminals, no wonder he's petrified.)</blockquote><br /><br />And that's why we hate Chris Matthews -- because he's not stupid. He's not even a craven political opportunist like Pete Hoekstra, trying to pull in campaign cash from a bunch of unemployed people in Michigan who can no longer afford to fly anywhere but who can't see a connection between the money squandered by the Bush Administration on pointless and badly-conducted wars and the fact that they have no health care. He's a media opportunist, and that may be worse.<br /><br />(cross-posted at <a href="http://brilliantatbreakfast.blogspot.com">Brilliant at Breakfast</a>.)Jillhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03865082576641051315noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6894689265232786252.post-63459440344869959032009-07-21T16:07:00.000-07:002009-07-21T16:09:47.339-07:00I'm not fooled that Matthews is on our side, but this is pretty goodI would have liked to have seen Tweety stomp on this "birther"'s head a few times, but we'll take what we can get:<br /><div align="center"><br /><object width="400" height="332"><param name="movie" value="http://www.dailykostv.com/flv/player.swf"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="flashvars" value="config=http://www.dailykostv.com/w/001958/vxml.php?400"></param><embed src="http://www.dailykostv.com/flv/player.swf" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="400" height="332" flashvars="config=http://www.dailykostv.com/w/001958/vxml.php?400"></embed></object><br /></div>Jillhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03865082576641051315noreply@blogger.com4tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6894689265232786252.post-4693111697374493672009-03-08T16:46:00.000-07:002009-03-08T16:50:12.815-07:00Just when you think Chris Matthews might be redeemableYou get idiocy like <a href="http://crooksandliars.com/nicole-belle/chris-matthews-show-obama-needs-limba">this</a>:<br /><blockquote>MATTHEWS: You know who can talk? You know who can talk? Limbaugh. You don’t have to like the big guy, but you know what he does? He defends capitalism. What he says is, “You, Mr. President, are out there raising taxes and getting rid of deductability and itemization and putting more injury on those of us who are already injured. You’re hurting the people who are driving the truck.”<br /><br />PAGE: Right, and nobody believes that but dittoheads. The fact is, Bush has already done the same darn thing. That argument isn’t working right now. People know that government is in a spend mode, and by the way, you know we’ve been in….<br /><br />MATTHEWS: Limbaugh’s numbers are doubled. Barack Obama’s numbers are not doubled. </blockquote>Jillhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03865082576641051315noreply@blogger.com4tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6894689265232786252.post-61351837280579318132009-02-26T18:03:00.000-08:002009-02-26T18:04:45.181-08:00Then again, sometimes I DON'T hate Chris MatthewsIt's about time someone called one of these Republicans about their childish use of "Democrat Party":<br /><div align="center"><br /><object width="400" height="300"><param name="movie" value="http://www.dailykostv.com/flv/player.swf"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><param name="flashvars" value="config=http://www.dailykostv.com/vxml/000815.php?400"></param><embed src="http://www.dailykostv.com/flv/player.swf" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="400" height="300" flashvars="config=http://www.dailykostv.com/vxml/000815.php?400"></embed></object><br /></div><br /><br />We now return you to your regularly scheduled hatred of Chris Matthews, already in progress.Jillhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03865082576641051315noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6894689265232786252.post-60687219376990646312008-08-27T10:59:00.001-07:002008-08-27T10:59:56.983-07:00Chris Matthews Rubber Room Watch: Democratic National Convention Edition: Part One in (hopefully) a seriesChris Matthews sounding like a petulant four year old? Priceless:<br /><br /><div align="center"><br /><object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/i1pLMSaPTi8&hl=en&fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/i1pLMSaPTi8&hl=en&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object><br /></div>Jillhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03865082576641051315noreply@blogger.com2tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6894689265232786252.post-29919851085855878342008-05-16T04:52:00.000-07:002008-05-16T04:53:43.883-07:00This is awesome<div align="center"><br /><object width="425" height="355"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/d1wSZBTAXRs&hl=en"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/d1wSZBTAXRs&hl=en" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="355"></embed></object><br /></div><br /><br />We still hate Chris Matthews on balance, though.Jillhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03865082576641051315noreply@blogger.com2tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6894689265232786252.post-86349023752982944852008-03-19T17:34:00.000-07:002008-03-19T17:36:36.591-07:00Tweety cops a feelIt sure looks to me that Tweety is groping Ellen Degeneres at the end of this dance:<br /><br /><div align="center"><br /><iframe height="339" width="425" src="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/22425001/vp/#" frameborder="0" scrolling="no"></iframe><br /></div>Jillhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03865082576641051315noreply@blogger.com3tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6894689265232786252.post-29119614918459549262008-02-20T18:07:00.000-08:002008-02-20T18:23:52.046-08:00Kirk Watson respondsTexas state rep. Kirk Watson <a href="http://www.kirkwatson.com/media/whats-new/2008/02/20/msnbc-and-me/">responds</a> to having been ambushed by Chris Matthews on Hardball the other night:<br /><br /><blockquote>On Tuesday night, after an important and historic victory in the Wisconsin Presidential Primary by Senator Barack Obama, I appeared on the MSNBC post-election program. “Hardball” host Chris Matthews (who is, it turns out, as ferocious as they say), began grilling me on Senator Obama’s legislative record.<br /><br />And my mind went blank. I expected to be asked about the primary that night, or the big one coming up in Texas on March 4, or just about anything else in the news. When the subject changed so emphatically, I reached for information that millions of my fellow Obama supporters could recite by heart, and I couldn’t summon it.<br /><br />My most unfortunate gaffe is not, in any way, a comment on Senator Obama, his substantial record, or the great opportunity we all share to elect him President of the United States.<br /><br />Had I not lost my mind, here are the accomplishments I would have mentioned:<br /><br />Senator Obama’s fight for universal children’s health care in Illinois. <br />His success bringing Republicans and Democrats together (a huge selling point for me in general) on bills such as the one in Illinois requiring police interrogations and confessions to be videotaped. <br />His leadership on ethics reform in Washington (the bill that lobbyists and special interests are complaining about right now has his name on it). <br />His bill to make the federal budget far more transparent and accessible to Americans via the Internet – we could use that openness in Texas. <br />And his vital work with Republicans to lock down nuclear weapons around the world.<br />Of course, it would have helped to remember all of this last night. I encourage anyone who wants to know more (especially Mr. Matthews) to log onto texas.barackobama.com.<br /><br />In the meantime, let’s not lose focus on what’s important in this election. It’s not my stunning televised defeat in “Stump the Chump.” Thankfully, it has nothing at all to do with me.<br /><br />What’s important is the direction our country is headed. What’s important are the priorities, methods, and, yes, accomplishments of those seeking the highest office in the country.<br /></blockquote><br /><br />Exactly.<br /><br />Now, granted, the Obama campaign ought to make sure that in today's "Gotcha!" media environment, their public faces are prepared for any eventuality. But watching Chris Matthews ambush this guy was like watching the episode of <i>Family Guy</i> that ran on CW tonight <a href="http://videos.wobbit.com/funny~video-family-guy-peter-beats-up-chris-bully~g-12565.html">in which Peter Griffin decides, after beating up a 13-year-old, that bullying is fun</a>.<br /><br /><div align="center"><br /><object width="425" height="355"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/5d91jxghTnE&rel=1"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/5d91jxghTnE&rel=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="355"></embed></object><br /></div>Jillhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03865082576641051315noreply@blogger.com8tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6894689265232786252.post-91739996151475387702008-01-28T20:22:00.000-08:002008-01-28T20:31:02.495-08:00We Have Blacks, Too, You Know.<a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjeZTd8-ur2G9r8Cz5p9zHEU944jZThbp9lIzS7dJzeqNVOb-T0VGYh_HPbOEHMMJc91HfUrvRmFrB7CKz-z-rcKHqUZFp93AfADwQGcaGho3yzvLmcCn0W5Q9w0rhwCw0VPAvwQj0ELc33/s1600-h/matthews_imus.jpg"><img style="display:block; margin:0px auto 10px; text-align:center;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjeZTd8-ur2G9r8Cz5p9zHEU944jZThbp9lIzS7dJzeqNVOb-T0VGYh_HPbOEHMMJc91HfUrvRmFrB7CKz-z-rcKHqUZFp93AfADwQGcaGho3yzvLmcCn0W5Q9w0rhwCw0VPAvwQj0ELc33/s320/matthews_imus.jpg" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5160749875364459570" /></a><br />In a priceless catch by the gang at Crooks and Liars, they actually heard "Tweety" Matthews say this right after the State of the Union Address:<br /><blockquote>Matthews:”…And I have to think given the ethnic, you know, excitement - let’s call it American excitement about Barack Obama. If he doesn’t make it to the nomination a lot of people on the Republican side might say, well why don’t we try do something to offset that and take advantage of the hope of having an African American at a high level of government.”</blockquote><br />So, in other words, whatever the Democrats can do, we can do better? Even if it involves getting black people "excited"?<br /><br />His idea was having a GOP contender tap Condi Rice. Yeah, like a Republican would choose someone with a Y chromosome darker than them for a running mate. I wonder how <span style="font-style:italic;">that</span> will sit with his old running buddy Colin Powell?<br /><br />Can someone please tell me why spongeheads like Chris Matthews and Don Imus, as well as Melanie Morgan, and Michael Savage and Hal Turner and the rest of those racist, homidical assclowns are not only employed by the media but are making more money than everyone who writes for this blog combined?Unknownnoreply@blogger.com8tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6894689265232786252.post-86525768056314948402008-01-25T07:28:00.001-08:002008-01-25T18:31:27.877-08:00Yo Mama! Apparently , Size Does Matter!<a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiv7AbOnzCHGsBvq9XokSxMB1-_OuRBwoh_Xia4rHwgzTQY7BujqroY7C0rBBBAg227M-uJyBO3qHUWd7xComW-SnFdT8SaN2PCCnH6AKhg2CAsnJszPfFHBUOYi152A_yqK2jbknz33ypI/s1600-h/tweetycheerleader.jpg"><img style="margin: 0px auto 10px; display: block; text-align: center; cursor: pointer;" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiv7AbOnzCHGsBvq9XokSxMB1-_OuRBwoh_Xia4rHwgzTQY7BujqroY7C0rBBBAg227M-uJyBO3qHUWd7xComW-SnFdT8SaN2PCCnH6AKhg2CAsnJszPfFHBUOYi152A_yqK2jbknz33ypI/s320/tweetycheerleader.jpg" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5159604821588191906" border="0" /></a><br /><br /><br />So sez Tweety this evening: "Big Bill surrounds Obama, is Hill thrilled? You bet yo mama!"<br />Really, does he write his own material? Are the news writers out on strike too?<br />My Mom found that hilarious, but I think its a bit too edgy for right now...and for some reason it drags me back to the Jefferson's and Brooklyn in the 70's....<span style="font-style: italic;">we're-a movin' on up, to the eastside... </span><br /><br />From the blundering morass that is MSNBC's coverage of the mess in Florida, I just don't know what to say anymore.I feel like I should apologize or something, in that MSNBC might sorta partially represent the left in any way...<span style="font-style: italic;">To a deee-luxe apartment, in the sky...</span><br /><br />This blog about Chris Matthews isn't nearly broad enough to cover the range of wankery that goes on over there. Ive been watching Matthews look all spooked, with those tail-between-the-legs-don't-hit-me-again-papa wide eyes, like he's a teenager who has gone too far. Then theres the obnoxious-little-weenie brother, Tucky, and the Deputy Dawg smirk of Morning Joe...We need a wider focus here because they play off eachother, and ...I dunno...you would think that there weren't soldiers dying in Iraq just about every day. Bring me my tin foil hat, honey, because I could swear that they were sending messages to eachother, the base, and for whoever has their finger on the Manchurian button lately .<br /><br />First of all, What happened to all that war coverage that was pretty great for a while and was a major part of the day ongoing? Where is Richard Engle, Mick Ware, and Mike Boettcher? Where is the sand and grit, and reports from embeds outside of the green zone? Has that become a non-story because the actual <span style="font-style: italic;">War</span> part is supposedly over? I'm trying to remember what I felt like to get good first hand reportage. Ever since the morning that I woke to find that David Bloom had died, while rushing towards certain disaster anyway, and trading bible passages with Timmeuh Russert; just saying no, no, no,(<span style="font-style: italic;">Jane, how do you stop this crazy thing?</span>)and those images that Bloom had worked so hard to bring to us from right on the ground level of hell.... and ever since my worst fears were confirmed and reconfirmed about how badly we were lied to, and how the media went along with it, Ive tried to find whatever group of news people that don't aren't too scary in their strange toned-down world of morning television , and even then, I watch closely...I don't trust any one of them except Olbermann, Stewart, and Colbert (and that's a backwards kind of trust.)<br /><br /><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEg7sJWUyqmIU7_i5ue88exVJXYfy59QaAu3fS0OfYPPaCVMUugErXpBqE9hOVOYWnxKgG1eZGclk5fJRXneqdckQVae-dQBqU4M-XSwJbeLlbzu9UKO2qvjOI33uqQvKU2dyqvUNL1E-c53/s1600-h/gutterballs.jpg"><img style="margin: 0px auto 10px; display: block; text-align: center; cursor: pointer;" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEg7sJWUyqmIU7_i5ue88exVJXYfy59QaAu3fS0OfYPPaCVMUugErXpBqE9hOVOYWnxKgG1eZGclk5fJRXneqdckQVae-dQBqU4M-XSwJbeLlbzu9UKO2qvjOI33uqQvKU2dyqvUNL1E-c53/s320/gutterballs.jpg" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5159604039904144018" border="0" /></a><br /><br />I have to admit that I have been an avid MSNBC/NBC watcher, from my war coverage to just about everything else, morning to night. I guess you could say that I know them pretty well. But even if they are less scary than the Good Morning America crew or the CNN group, I still have seen them sway and bend with the political weather, and probably more due to the Bushies actual spiralling apart in front of our very eyes, than the people's desire for truth. I didn't notice especially the the rats started deserting the sinking ship till pretty late in the game, and some of them are surely still hanging on to that ship or a portion thereof, just in case the republicans pull something out of their combined asses, (swiftboating, anyone?), and that leads to 4 more years. I've seen too much hedging and positioning, and not wanting to get caught on the wrong side of criticizing the President...as if this isn't America; as if we don't live in a society where the job of reporter comes with the assumption of cojones and truth.<br /><br />The war correspondents have given way to the politicians walking flanked by security guards, through the Baghdad marketplace. There was some certain transfer of authority from the correspondents that are on the ground, to the generals who are supposed to dig us out of this mess and juggle the desires of all the characters in the hearing room, and the politicians, all jockeying for position, or the correct position in this matter.<br /><br />And what has become of the correspondents in Iraq? We cut to them from time to time, but it seems that there are selective blackouts on pictures of suicide bombs and other tragedies, that are certainly as much a part of the war as the wash across the desert was and the squads of brave soldiers breaking down door after door to find huddled, terrified, families, and who knows what else in the bedroom or beyond the patio.<br />Yeah, the drudgery of day to day village cleaning doesn't pop like those initial images, and at some point ratings have to take over, I guess. But I'd expect that even if the American public might grow numb and tired of watching soldiers and civilians getting blown up, to the players its every bit as terribly real and attention getting as the new season of American Idol. Who says that we get to divorce ourselves from the reality of what we started? How can we be a society that becomes bored and moves on to the new season of must-see TV?<br /><br />This morning Scarborough was actually mouthing messages to his base on camera, saying "he's wrong" over and over to the camera in response to comments about Ron Paul's crazy and insane call to end the war....<br />Dan Abrams spends his evenings chasing his tail with the remnants of whatever scandal is left over from the day: Is it wrong to expect more than the constant repetition of <span style="font-style: italic;">breaking news</span> from Heath Ledger's tragic death, only to find that its a story about how masseuses get certified for CPR? How far of a stretch is that? Who was called first? Is that breaking news? There is no story there guys; its just a tragedy like every other tragedy happening every day. Theres nothing to see, just drive on by.<br /><br />I don't know why it so flabbergasts me, and call me naive, but most of the country, including the republicans are for pulling out of Iraq, and most everyone agrees that this is a criminal administration, so where do pundits or newspeople get off acting like this anymore? <a href="http://www.newshounds.us/2008/01/24/the_big_story_is_john_gibson.php">John Gibson</a> made fun of an actor's death, saying that it was probably due to suicide while watching the democratic debates, Chris Matthews thinks nothing of spending months telling his audience that one candidate is the definite nominee, at the same time as he keeps up a pretty heinous running commentary about her and her husband. After Matthews was made to grudgingly apologize for his remarks, Little Tucker Carlson stepped in and repeated them..I'm not even going to go into the Rush Limbaughs and the Bill O'Reillys out there. I cant even believe that I'm grouping MSNBC into the same world with Fox News, but...they are growing in that direction, and it is beyond me why the powers would allow this to continue, what with the mood of the country and the real movement of us all towards a middle/left mentality. Its like the inmates have taken over the asylum, and there is a fine line between shock for ratings, and alienating your audience ...and ultimately we will switch the TV off. If I will then anyone would quite sooner, because I am a real TV person, and a real MSNBC watcher.<br /><br />MSNBC seems to be getting its ducks in a row behind Keith Olbermann, but its not happening quickly enough. David Schuster and Rachel Maddow would be an excellent pair for a roundtable show or even a straight news show. They both are quirky as hell, but also smarter than smart. And they could garner a great following just because they are so quirky; it makes them each lovable and human. MSNBC has an embarrassment of talent to keep falling back on the same old failed line up. ...Chuck Todd, Richard Engle. Why is he so underutilized; Oh yeah, hes a foreign correspondent and we don't want to show much about that messy foreign stuff now, do we? Isn't it preferable to have Tweety and Tucky telling us like it really is over there? Sam Seder is fantastic with his sort of sparkle smirk and humor, which is the secret ingredient to any news show working well.<br /><br />This morning I was sick, and laying helpless in bed flipping channels, trying to get past the local news on every network channel...and finally I jumped to channel 68, where I found the face of Willie Giest filing the screen, donning 70's tinted aviators and his canary-in-my-mouth, slap-my-face, look. The camera pulled back and there he was with two bikini-topped hula girls at the Hawaiian Tropic...um...restaurant...kiosk at the mall...booth at the convention center...?<br />Because I guess that since Mika and Scarborough were in Boca (Joe's home town, or so he told us over and over again, as if that's a <span style="font-style: italic;">good</span> thing,) Willie was pretending that he was in Hawaii...huh? Childish banter ensued, as if we were supposed to be fond of these guys, and then we were back to the <span style="font-style: italic;">hard </span>news of the debate last night.<br /><br />Scarborough is proud to be a republican, even in light of the line-up of clowns who are representing his party. What they said is not worth reporting, because it doesn't amount to much, except for Ron Paul's usual anti-war rhetoric, that is good to hear but it tends to take away from his real platform of government abolishment and all kinds of silliness.<br />But Paul going on about ending the war and Morning Joe's silent commentary ("he's wrong, he's wrong, he's wrong")...and I know that this is an entertainment show, but I felt...offended...and I found myself looking at the curve of his nose and his little hateful mouth, his sickeningly thick hair, and I wondered how people like this get a platform. I know that when I switch him on, its because there is nothing else on...and lately because he has given John Edwards some air time. But today, this morning, I turned him off.<br /><br />Do you hear that MSNBC? I turned your fucking Morning Joe off! ...And, I am, what might be referred to as, a loyal viewer. I lay here thinking about how Scarborough is their Deputy Dawg, sending a less than subliminal message to his base, and to the doleful Matthews and the under-appreciated and misunderstood Tucker Carlson. And I was wondering how it makes sense at all that a guy like this gets to pretty much state, on national TV, that the war is a good thing, or that we are not failing over there, in the bigger or the smaller views, without a peep from any one of the correspondents that MSNBC has supposedly under contract...Maybe they have cut them all loose; I haven't seen much of Engle since he went on his book tour and Boettcher seems to also have vanished after covering some major stories out of Atlanta.<br /><br />The point is that they no doubt have some correspondents out there, or they have access to stringers, and they choose time and again to allow the right leaning, misogynist pundits to rewrite the storyline of our tragic tale; Which wouldn't be anything different than business as usual except for the fact that we are living in dangerous times, and to see Morning Joe winking into the camera just as John McCain is going on about the glory of the war, and decrying whatever it was that they have renamed the cut and runners, I get a sinking feeling.<br /><br />Finally, in light of Huckabee's comparison between WMA and Easter eggs, and my Psych 101 text book, I've got to nod towards <a href="http://shakespearessister.blogspot.com/2008/01/i-write-letters_25.html">Melissa's pundit's balls open letter</a>, (not cross posted here for some reason; maybe she just hasn't had time yet,) and the obvious obsession, in these days of wimmin and blacks being uppity enough to run for high office, with their own cojones and how every man, woman, and child must be admiring their manliness....I guess its hard to get knocked down a peg or five.... but, I have no empathy for those who have played such a deadly and destructive role in American History. Serving as a warning to others might be the best payback to a suffering country.<br /><span style="font-style: italic;">We've Finally Got a Piece of the Pie....<br /></span><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiZLooO5WCamguYPBat-EjBMLWufICYOLBR1f71GrxPVs6HLJ5mvTLQhb6zg1CMyHob7V8a7KDQW1XAjl8-W2qAmQKOjc84cPC9hT5HQZ_MlqkR7OeS9kodG6HkDJhYheUtticzjDpqB1mw/s1600-h/jeffersonsTshirt.jpg"><img style="margin: 0px auto 10px; display: block; text-align: center; cursor: pointer;" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiZLooO5WCamguYPBat-EjBMLWufICYOLBR1f71GrxPVs6HLJ5mvTLQhb6zg1CMyHob7V8a7KDQW1XAjl8-W2qAmQKOjc84cPC9hT5HQZ_MlqkR7OeS9kodG6HkDJhYheUtticzjDpqB1mw/s320/jeffersonsTshirt.jpg" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5159603709191662210" border="0" /></a>Unknownnoreply@blogger.com3tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6894689265232786252.post-34879657875422691252008-01-21T12:38:00.000-08:002008-02-20T07:52:05.383-08:00Chris Matthews, Nad DefenderI trust that title will be enough to make you <a href="http://www.slowpokecomics.com/2008/01/this-weeks-strip-chris-matthews-nad.html">click here</a>.Unknownnoreply@blogger.com3tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6894689265232786252.post-80996079989186609762008-01-20T06:44:00.000-08:002008-01-20T06:50:31.337-08:00Thus Spake Tweety: McCain is the new ReaganThe long romance between Chris Matthews and the somnambulent, baggy-eyed, Aqua Velva Senator <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Tex-Averys-Droopy-Theatrical-Collection/dp/B000MTPA5Y">Droopy</a> from Tennessee is over. So is the "I'm Ronald Reagan. No, <strong>I'm</strong> Ronald Reagan. No, you dumbass, <strong>I'm</strong> Ronald Reagan" dance of the Republican candidate. Yesterday Matthews decided that <strong>John McCain</strong> is the new Reagan:<br /><br /><blockquote>CM: It’s a heavily invested night. He brought his mother. Cindy looked very much like a first lady. It was a fascinating presentation. It gave me the tableau tonight of a man who believes—he may be wrong, of course—that this is his big night. That this is the night (that) will launch him. I would expect that the next step tomorrow morning, he gets up and calls Nancy Reagan and ask for an endorsement. I think he’s going to try to make himself “the Reagan candidate,” as he did in that speech, try to do it now, go for it, this is his chance, try to bring the party together under him. I think this is it for him and he knows it. <br /></blockquote><br /><br />Video at <a href="http://www.crooksandliars.com/2008/01/20/sc-primary-coverage-chris-matthews-wants-to-wrap-the-mantle-of-reagan-around-mccain/#more-25500">Crooks and Liars</a>.Jillhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03865082576641051315noreply@blogger.com4tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6894689265232786252.post-8765629856907686192008-01-18T16:52:00.000-08:002008-01-18T16:58:20.659-08:00Tucker's Hoof-in-Mouth Problem: An Open Letter to MSNBC.....<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family: "Comic Sans MS";">An Open Letter to <a href="letters@msnbc.com">MSNBC</a><o:p></o:p></span></p> <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family: "Comic Sans MS";"><o:p> </o:p></span></p> <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family: "Comic Sans MS";">I am one of the many, many people who has been “<span style="font-style: italic;">hurt</span>” and dismayed by Chris Matthews’ abuse of his position, and woman hating, boorish, behavior. The viewers obviously agree, as this situation has blown up and resulted in an on air apology from Matthews last night. That apology can only be the result of many complaints over the past months and even years, and especially due to his contention that Hillary Clinton would never have gotten anywhere if she hadn’t been a wronged woman.<o:p></o:p></span></p> <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family: "Comic Sans MS";">I am SO tired of having to watch that man, first repeat over and over who my candidate was going to be, then act incredulous at the fact that he may have been wrong, and continuously cut down the candidate who he obviously has a grudge against, and THEN sheepishly apologize, obviously not meaning it, and seemingly at the direction of his bosses, for the disgustingly misogynistic statements that he makes constantly, and for his boorish behavior…But no, he didn’t even actually apologize; rather, he told us that we had misunderstood his LOVE of politics and the players. Well, I don’t buy it. I didn’t misunderstand, and I am tired of being put down by another pasty white man who thinks that he represents the melting pot of America…think again!<o:p></o:p></span></p> <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family: "Comic Sans MS";"><o:p> </o:p></span></p> <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family: "Comic Sans MS";">This evening, I had the unlucky opportunity to walk into a room where the horrible Tucker Carlson was on the TV, and before I could flee, he was saying, <span style=""> </span>“I know that we are not <i style="">supposed</i> to say it around here, but….” And then go on to restate the same crap about Hillary! I believe that this was part of a spot on the Tyra Banks interview that <st1:place st="on"><st1:city st="on">Clinton</st1:City></st1:place> did and her talking about Bill cheating. <o:p></o:p></span></p> <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family: "Comic Sans MS";">Is that issue out of bounds for Hillary? No! Its part of her life story and she can talk about it if she wants to. It’s a huge leap to say that she only got where she is because of it!<o:p></o:p></span></p> <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family: "Comic Sans MS";">Tucker has no visible means of support! He has horrible ratings, nothing to say, and a bad attitude. His libertarian views are based on a prep school/frat boy existence that would, of course, allow him to support himself and his family with no social safety net and no care for anyone else in society. Who does he represent in the audience? Not me, that’s for sure! He actually proves, every time I see him, that he has an incredible amount of animosity towards me and people like me. So, who are you trying to attract with his show? And doesn’t it make sense that he has such low ratings? Does he even have sponsors? How does one get this kind of job security, because it’s a rare thing in today’s <st1:place st="on"><st1:country-region st="on">America</st1:country-region></st1:place>.<o:p></o:p></span></p> <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family: "Comic Sans MS";"><o:p> </o:p></span></p> <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family: "Comic Sans MS";">Tonight, Tucker Carlson had the nerve to pile on to Matthews’ apology and restate the offending statement as if he is giving some sort of virtual high five to his friend…what could your producers, programmers, and whoever the bosses are over there, be thinking anymore? Did you come to the decision with Matthews to have him apologize only to have the petulant little child, Tucker, run between your legs and stick his tongue out at the viewers who complained? That is what he just did. And he did it not only as a statement against management, but as a clear message to the viewers…I consider this to be offensive and directed at me, as much as it is directed at Clinton or anyone else out here who might disagree with the frat boys club who think they know everything.<o:p></o:p></span></p> <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family: "Comic Sans MS";">I am a woman and a long time MSNBC viewer. I am also someone who is very involved with the political process and I hope to turn to MSNBC for some insightful commentary, considering what else is available. But, obviously this is not the direction that your programmers want to go in.<o:p></o:p></span></p> <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family: "Comic Sans MS";"><o:p> </o:p></span></p> <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family: "Comic Sans MS";">Your few saving graces, such as Rachel Maddow, David Schuster, and the commentary of some fantastic guests such as Sam Seder, are feeling like not quite enough. Yes, I will watch Keith Olbermann anytime and follow him anywhere he broadcasts from, but the rest of<span style=""> </span>your lineup is such that I have to turn off the station as soon as that hour is over! <span style=""> </span>When are you going to make some changes? <o:p></o:p></span></p> <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family: "Comic Sans MS";"><o:p> </o:p></span></p> <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family: "Comic Sans MS";"><o:p></o:p></span><b><span style="">Melina </span></b><span style=""><o:p></o:p></span></p> <p class="MsoNormal"><b><span style=""> </span></b><span style=""><o:p></o:p></span></p> <p class="MsoNormal"><b><span style=""><a href="http://www.ripcoco.com/">www.RIPCoco.com</a></span></b><span style=""><o:p></o:p></span><br /><b><span style=""><a href="http://www.brilliantatbreakfast.blogspot.com/">www.Brilliantatbreakfast.blogspot.com</a><o:p></o:p><br /><a href="http://www.sweetjesusihatechrismatthews.blogspot.com/">www.SweetJesusIHateChrisMatthews.blogspot.com</a> </span></b><span style=""><o:p></o:p></span></p> <p class="MsoNormal"><span style=""> <o:p></o:p></span></p> <p class="MsoNormal"><span style=""> <o:p></o:p></span></p>Unknownnoreply@blogger.com4tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6894689265232786252.post-88228988764031312322008-01-17T15:58:00.000-08:002008-01-17T16:05:56.118-08:00Video and Transcript of ApologyDon't forget to read Melina's take on it <a href="http://sweetjesusihatechrismatthews.blogspot.com/2008/01/argh-ball-tweetys-sorta-apology.html">here</a>.<br /><br /><br /><object height="355" width="425"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/FSNL2CV29m8&rel=1"><param name="wmode" value="transparent"><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/FSNL2CV29m8&rel=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" height="355" width="425"></embed></object><br /><br />MATTHEWS: Good evening, I'm Chris Matthews. Welcome to Hardball. Well, we're in a time of a lot of frustration in this country -- Iraq, of course; the lack of health care for people who work every day; gas prices going up; the weakening economy that scares us every day -- and I come on here every night and try to wrestle with these frustrations, and also the changes in our country. We might soon have the first woman president, the first African-American president, or a man older than we've ever elected before. And of course, we always treat things here with hope -- our uniquely American hope that we can actually make things better, that we can make the greatest of countries, not only survive, but as [author] William Faulkner once said, "prevail."<br /><br />In the midst of talking about all of this -- almost always without a script, and almost always on tricky subjects of gender and race, and right and left, and what's in our country's interest, and who I think is telling the truth, and who I think isn't -- I know I'm dealing with sensitive feelings. I've accepted all of this as part of the business I have chosen. This program, I am proud to say, is tough, fearless, and yes, blunt. I want people to react when I say something. I don't like saying things so carefully, so politically correctly, that no one thinks they even said anything.<br /><br />What I've always counted on in all the wild, speeded-up conversations on Hardball, and elsewhere on television, is my good heart. I've always felt that no matter how tough I got, how direct, how provocative -- how purposely provocative -- people out there watching would know I was not out against them, that it was them I was rooting for, that while I was tough on individuals who sought to lead the country, I was not against the hopes we all have for a fair shake, in fact, a better deal for people who have been held back before we came along.<br /><br />Some people whom I respect, politically concerned people like you who watch this show so faithfully every night, people like me who care about this country, think I've been disrespectful to Hillary Clinton, not as a candidate, but as a woman. They point to something I said on MSNBC's Morning Joe the morning after the New Hampshire primary, that her election to the U.S. Senate, and all that's come since, was a result of her toughness, but also the sympathy for her because her husband embarrassed her by the conduct that led to his impeachment, because he, in the words I used, "messed around."<br /><br />The truth of course is finer, smarter, larger than that. Yes, Hillary Clinton won tremendous respect from the country for the way she handled those difficult months in 1998. Her public approval numbers spiked from the mid-40s up to the 70s in one poll I looked at.<br /><br />Why? Because she stuck to her duty; she performed strongly as first lady. She did such a wow of a job campaigning for Senate candidates, especially Chuck Schumer of New York, that she was urged to run for a Senate seat there herself. She might have well gotten that far by another route and through different circumstances, but this is how it happened.<br /><br />The rest is history: how Hillary went up to New York, listened to peoples' concerns, and beat the odds, as well as the Republicans, to become a respected member of the U.S. Senate. So, did I say it right? Was it fair to say that Hillary Clinton, like any great politician, took advantage of a crisis to prove herself? Was her conduct in 1998 a key to starting her independent electoral career the following year? Yes.<br /><br />Was it fair to imply that Hillary's whole career depended on being a victim of an unfaithful husband? No. And that's what it sounded like I was saying and it hurt people I'd like to think normally like what I say, in fact, normally like me. As I said, I rely on my heart to guide me in the heated, fast-paced talk we have here on Hardball -- a heart that bears only goodwill toward people trying to make it out there, especially those who haven't before.<br /><br />If my heart has not always controlled my words, on those occasions when I have not taken the time to say things right, or have simply said the inappropriate thing, I'll try to be clearer, smarter, more obviously in support of the right of women -- of all people -- the full equality and respect for their ambitions. So, I get it.<br /><br />On the particular point, if I had said that the only reason [Sen.] John McCain [R-AZ] has come so far is that he got shot down over North Vietnamese -- by North Vietnam, and captured by the enemy, I'd be brutally ignoring the courage and guts he showed in bearing up under his captivity. Saying that Senator Clinton got where she's got simply because her husband did what he did to her is just as callous, and I can see now, it comes across just as nasty, worse yet, just as dismissive.<br /><br />Finally -- as if anyone doesn't know this -- I love politics. I love politicians. I like and respect people with the guts to put their name, their very being out there for public approval so that they can lead our country. And that goes for Hillary and [Sen.] Barack [Obama (D-IL)] and John and all the rest who are willing to fight to take on the toughest job in the world.<br /><br />So, let's get on with the show. Whoa.<br /><br />(Transcript courtesy of <a href="http://mediamatters.org/items/200801170019">Media Matters.</a> Video courtesy of <a href="http://shakespearessister.blogspot.com/2008/01/hardballing-for-apology.html">Petulant</a>.)Unknownnoreply@blogger.com7tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6894689265232786252.post-69324919201668579892008-01-17T14:18:00.000-08:002008-01-17T14:47:20.158-08:00ARGH-ball! Tweety's Sorta Apology....<a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhHSCH8W9T8AtQkCSuvh_zVYwqVmzwVRtIHtoT3dsDUXB7crW8j9Wn19m5SDvXa45vziTzVRO9BkBtQGNSMEH1B2ij7tLQ09YxTc4FGElIli4u3sAFxMsUhxtAPqCMLMT5YyCot1xatdYYH/s1600-h/catatethetweety.jpg"><img style="margin: 0px auto 10px; display: block; text-align: center; cursor: pointer;" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhHSCH8W9T8AtQkCSuvh_zVYwqVmzwVRtIHtoT3dsDUXB7crW8j9Wn19m5SDvXa45vziTzVRO9BkBtQGNSMEH1B2ij7tLQ09YxTc4FGElIli4u3sAFxMsUhxtAPqCMLMT5YyCot1xatdYYH/s320/catatethetweety.jpg" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5156578540964478114" border="0" /></a><br />Well, now Ive seen everything....<br /><br />I guess the heat got too hot in the frying pan at MSNBC, and after a phone interview with Morning Joe last week, "<a href="http://www.crooksandliars.com/2008/01/12/chris-matthews-stands-behind-his-words/">Standing by his words..."</a><br />and an insane visit with Jay Leno this week, much the same, chuckling and guffawing about how he is the non PC, wild man of politics...grasping on the slippery slope, the vines snapped tonight and there he was at 5PM, looking dolefully into the camera, and telling me something serious.<br />Something to the effect of; I know I'm wild and crazy; I know I shoot from the hip; but thats who I am. I said some things about Hillary and they were mean...and probably wrong...and unfair too...and I hurt people!! But, I LOVE POLITICS...I love Johnny and Baracky andHill...I love Mittsy and bootsy and bitsy and Bushy....I LOVE YOU ALL!...(and thats why I hit you!)<br />CAN I , PHULEEZE, STAY ON THE AIR??...Stop the complainin' to the bosses here!!<br />Now lets get on with the show!<br /><br />I dont buy it...no, I dont...not even a little...<br />I wish I had been a fly on the wall in those meetings...imagine what goes into making Matthews make a sincere and personal apology into the camera, between him and us?<br /><br />And in breaking the 4th wall, (of which 2.5 are made of freakish bluster, even though he technically "talks" to us,) acting as if he sincerely sees us and is communicating from the heart, he proved that he really shouldn't do that; Leave that territory to Keith Olbermann and his brilliant comments. It came off as forced and disingenuous. But what else would we expect from out Tweety?<br /><br /><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://postsecret.blogspot.com/"><img style="margin: 0px auto 10px; display: block; text-align: center; cursor: pointer;" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhy-HWrlIDsifwfW3GAuXQBLM52jiQk2wBBsv3NzJpCuVyDt29MFlOliptHiZmrnigY47a2Z3VZRTqCU_FZx7GsOZirky_vaVIiraXUpfodoQvIq3BicZSH_qnRuWT7sGcr8ZNLaWvSalyu/s320/meds.jpg" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5156580142987279538" border="0" /></a>c/p <a href="http://www.ripcoco.com">RIPCoco</a><br />c/p <a href="http://www.brilliantatbreakfast.blogspot.com">Brilliant at Breakfast</a>Unknownnoreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6894689265232786252.post-24441382928120844462008-01-16T18:53:00.000-08:002008-01-16T19:09:07.291-08:00Protest rally against Chris Matthews in DC tomorrowI just received this e-mail from the National Women's Political Caucus:<br /><br /><blockquote>I wanted to let you know that the National Women's Political Caucus is holding a rally tomorrow, January 17, 4:00pm outside of NBC News, 4001 Nebraska Ave NW (right off AU circle) to protest and object to Chris Matthews' sexist comments and behavior on "Hardball" and as a commentator on MSNBC.<br /><br />For your information, I am attaching a press advisory and the letter that NWPC, NOW, Feminist Majority and Women's Media Center sent to Steve Capus, President of NBC.<br /><br />Because the mission of the Caucus is to do everything we can to elect women to public office, we feel it is extremely important to call out sexism and sexist behavior on national television. We deserve better from a national television network.<br /><br />We need bodies at our rally. I would be eternally grateful if you could help us get the word out about this rally. And, it would be great if you could attend yourself. The weather is supposed to be terrible. Call me crazy, but protesting sexist behavior in the sleet and snow is my idea of a good time.<br /><br />Thank you for anything and everything you can do in this behalf.<br /><br />Best regards,<br />Clare<br />Clare Giesen<br />Executive Director<br />National Women's Political Caucus<br />1003 K Street, Suite 637<br />Washington, DC 20001<br />202-785-1100</blockquote><br /><br />NWPC appears to have endorsed Hillary Clinton, but you don't have to be a Hillary supporter to speak out against Matthews having a national podium from which to spout his misogyny.Jillhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03865082576641051315noreply@blogger.com4tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6894689265232786252.post-80448959020296873622008-01-16T15:37:00.000-08:002008-01-16T15:38:29.528-08:00Circlejerks<img src="http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v642/shakespeares_sister/tuckerchrissmall.png" /><br /><br />Good Stuff: On <em>Hardball</em> today, Chris Matthews really reached outside the box to interview fellow babblehead and <a href="http://shakespearessister.blogspot.com/2007/12/important-announcement.html">enormous douchebag</a> Tucker Carlson. And lookee there—they couldn't agree more. How splendid for us all.<br /><br />(<a href="http://shakespearessister.blogspot.com/2008/01/circlejerks.html">Cross-posted</a>.)Unknownnoreply@blogger.com1